W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > January 2019

[csswg-drafts] [css-logical] Should the `inset` shorthand allow quirks in their lengths like the individual properties do? (#3525)

From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:24 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-399835169-1547649143-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
emilio has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-logical] Should the `inset` shorthand allow quirks in their lengths like the individual properties do? ==
I'd prefer if not, but the current spec doesn't say. In quirks mode, some (non-zero) lengths don't require units, so for example `<div style="position: relative; top: 100">` works.

I'd prefer if we didn't have to do this for `inset`, given it's a new property, and that the `inset-` longhands don't allow this looks like.

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3525 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2019 14:32:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:42 UTC