- From: rcabanier via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 05:50:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I don't think `transform-style: preserve-3d` on the root today does anything, since the root implicitly flattens even if it has `preserve-3d` set, since there's no parent's 3-d scene to merge into. Ah, yes. I understand what you mean now. > So I don't think people would have a good reason to be using it today -- though that doesn't mean they aren't. So then the next question would be how many are, and then what the tradeoff between extra complexity and that compatibility cost is. Isn't it also a bit odd that a CSS property has a very different meaning on the root element compared to all other elements? If people think this is OK, I'm happy to drop the additional keyword. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rcabanier Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4242#issuecomment-526466604 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 30 August 2019 05:50:50 UTC