- From: Matthew Dean via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:58:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@valtlai > Could we use type="scoped" instead? (Similar to <script type="module">.) Hmm, as far as "guarding" against legacy browsers, I'm not sure the best approach. I'm not sure a type is ideal (and wouldn't be sufficient to "block" use with a legacy browser), but I feel like that's more of a detail. `type="scoped"` doesn't really specify what the scope identifier should be, so it would be requiring two new attributes instead of one, since specifying the scope on a link would implicitly indicate that it's a scoped stylesheet (a "type" of "scoped"). -- GitHub Notification of comment by matthew-dean Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4061#issuecomment-522730489 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 August 2019 19:58:41 UTC