Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] Should the values of image-orientation include the <angle> variants? (#4164)

For security reasons <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exif#Privacy_and_security> many imagehosts routinely strip Exif from uploads and don't necessarily rotate the image in the process. Imgur is a popular example.

> On Aug 19, 2019, at 8:40 AM, Simon Fraser <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> If you have a compelling reason to override an image's built-in orientation, please state it here! The CSS-WG is interested in these cases.
> 
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4164?email_source=notifications&email_token=AABG5DFN2YQXXXDYPENFIYDQFK5HLA5CNFSM4IIK5MOKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD4TMEBY#issuecomment-522633735>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABG5DDCQGUXJXGIDRZXTYTQFK5HLANCNFSM4IIK5MOA>.
> 



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by duanemoody
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4164#issuecomment-522684461 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 19 August 2019 17:49:53 UTC