W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > April 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-lists-3] counter-set vs counter-increment (#3810)

From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 00:09:27 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-480456457-1554509367-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

It also gives better cascading behavior in general (not just for the author/ua list-item negotiation).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3810#issuecomment-480456457 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 6 April 2019 00:09:29 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gérard Talbot via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-4] How to serialize calc(100% - 100% + 1em) at computed-value time (#3806)"
Previous message: fantasai via GitHub: "[csswg-drafts] [css-lists-3] counter-set vs counter-increment (#3810)"
In reply to: fantasai via GitHub: "[csswg-drafts] [css-lists-3] counter-set vs counter-increment (#3810)"
Next in thread: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-lists-3] counter-set vs counter-increment (#3810)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:46 UTC