- From: Eric Portis via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:49:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@loonybear my fault for not really asking a question! I guess my first implicit question, which you answered, was "would there be any weird interactions between `intrinsicsize` and this default `aspect-ratio` rule?" (sounds like, no 🎉). My second question is, given what you understand about the problem space, are there any problems you forsee with the proposed UA default style? The `intrinsicsize` explainer calls a solution built on `width` and `height` out for being [“not really backwards compatible”](https://github.com/ojanvafai/intrinsicsize-attribute#widthheight-set-the-intrinsic-size-new-override-attribute) – I've tried to think through some reasons why that might be, above, but I expect you or @ojanvafai can be more specific about what was meant by this, too. -- GitHub Notification of comment by eeeps Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/333#issuecomment-438451024 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2018 21:49:41 UTC