- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 16:51:43 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The Working Group just discussed `dppx vs x in serialization`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: dppx is canonical unit` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <fantasai> Topic: dppx vs x in serialization<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: When Webkit introduced -webkit-? function<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: They used an 'x' unit instead of using a <resolution><br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: <resolution> at the time didn't include 'x'<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: Wanted to make 'x' a resolution, too<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: equivalent to dppx<br> <smfr> s/-webkit-? function/-webkit-image-set/<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: For serialization, it seemed that ? function would be more often used than resolution queries in OM<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: So I wanted to make 'x' the canonical unit<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: Our implementers expressed some concern about this, thought we should use 'dppx'<br> <fantasai> Florian: If you have people with compat concerns, then let's minimize the concern<br> <fantasai> astearns: Any objections to using dppx and canonical unit<br> <TabAtkins> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2241<br> <fantasai> RESOLVED: dppx is canonical unit<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2241#issuecomment-387803943 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2018 16:51:46 UTC