- From: Ryosuke Niwa via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:23:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
By migrating to a new part-name interface, you mean from v0 API chrome supported? I don't think we'd need a short-hand for that since that's most likely taken care of by some sort of a library. It would be pretty crazy for each component author to keep around v0/v1 syntax mixed together. The fact you're confused about the direction of the arrow is yet another reason not to have the arrow. Like I said during F2F, the arrow doesn't have an inherent semantics here, and won't add any meaning beyond the order of tokens would convey. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rniwa Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2411#issuecomment-376084918 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 26 March 2018 08:23:28 UTC