- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 01:44:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
in #1715, @Loirooriol proposed the following table: [![diagram-small](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7477678/29187145-001bf1a4-7e0f-11e7-8ccb-fd0846c7e779.png)](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7477678/29187009-96422abe-7e0e-11e7-8bdf-1c4dbee2481f.png) This looks great to me, and I'd love to be able to use this as the basis for wrapping up this issue. I think we need to: 1. Agree on the table 2. Add the missing values to the ruby spec 3. Write normative text to define what the red arrows represent (preferably to be included in css-display) 4. Include the table in the spec as a note, because it is a really nice summary 5. Find and updates in all specs previously handwavy invocations of now these precisely defined concepts Agenda+F2F to sort this out. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-374443992 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2018 01:44:48 UTC