- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:43:14 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I guess it's fine if this is covered by tests to ensure implementers don't get confused. But just in case, some other less ambiguous ways in my opinion: > Otherwise (if the run-in sequence is not followed by such a block before reparenting) > Otherwise (if the run-in sequence has not been reparented) -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-398966791 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2018 03:43:17 UTC