W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display] More precise box transformations

From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:52:01 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-407597682-1532479920-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> Much better, thanks! But I'm still not convinced that boxes have display types. Boxes may have characteristics like level or formatting context, but probably only elements and tree-abiding pseudo-elements (i.e., things to which display applies) should have display types. So I would prefer to define box blockifications and inlinifications in terms of element blockifications and inlinifications (which are not currently defined). Do you think it's worth?

@Loirooriol I think that, unless the distinction becomes necessary because not having it creates significant confusion and misinterpretation of the specs, we should not make the distinction. We blur a lot of fine distinctions we could make in our discussions, because the cognitive load of being super-precise is unnecessary for understanding. Similarly, the spec should not slice everything up excessively: only insofar as it helps understanding, and not so far that it hinders it. I think in this case, it's not worth making the distinction. We can revisit if it becomes an actual problem down the line, though. Let me know if this is acceptable?

GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-407597682 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2018 00:52:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 2 July 2022 03:21:10 UTC