- From: Steve Orvell via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:21:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
This seems like a pretty powerful alternative to the current spec. It seems like it could be the exclusive way to describe parts. Consider:
```
// Defining Parts
// in x-foo
<style>
.thumb.active {
@part(thumb-active);
}
</style>
// Forwarding Parts
// in x-host that contains an x-foo
<style>
x-foo::part(thumb-active) {
@part(x-foo-thumb-active);
}
</style>
```
This would make it pretty easy to define parts that match complex selectors. For example, this would make it easier to expose parts for the "red" and "black" squares on a checkerboard.
If this is at all feasible to implement it seems worth exploring, at least briefly.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by sorvell
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2904#issuecomment-407593077 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2018 00:21:42 UTC