- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 02:36:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Oh! I misread your rule, I didn't realize they were two rules nested in the single parent rule.
(Tangent: that's an invalid rule, btw. Can't have a rule like `e f & {}`, needs to be `@nest e f & {}`.)
So that expands to the two rules `:matches(a b) c d {} e f :matches(a b) {}`. Or if you wanted to use your comma-separated one from the last comment, `:matches(a b) c d, e f :matches(a b) {}`.
What did you think was complicated about desugaring that?
--
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2881#issuecomment-403680485 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2018 02:36:10 UTC