Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors4] Name the “functional pseudo-class like :matches() with 0 specificity”

> one option was to have a specificity parameter in :matches

Was the option of having one pseudo-class with optional specificity parameter (regardless its exact name), instead of two almost identical in anything except specificity pseudo-classes, rejected completely? Since the specificity rules of `:matches()` [have already been redefined](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1027#issuecomment-393236516), so compatibility with existing implementations is not required anymore, maybe this option could have a second chance?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by SelenIT
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2143#issuecomment-402480888 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2018 13:34:18 UTC