Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors4] Name the “functional pseudo-class like :matches() with 0 specificity”

@therealglazou While I don't disagree with your argument in general, I do want to point out that Selectors 4 is dramatically behind process-wise, largely my fault since I have neglected it the last few years, and the features that Apple shipped were largely considered to be stable, so I don't fault them for shipping under the circumstances. I think @SelenIT's arguments are also important to consider. Nonetheless it would be good to collect some data. `:is()` as the opposite of `:not()` would be pretty nice to have, if it's possible to pull off--and it might be if the specificity of existing stylesheets’ `:matches()` arguments are shown to not matter in practice.

@LeaVerou Thanks for maintaining the table. :)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2143#issuecomment-361750056 using your GitHub account