- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 22:04:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@therealglazou While I don't disagree with your argument in general, I do want to point out that Selectors 4 is dramatically behind process-wise, largely my fault since I have neglected it the last few years, and the features that Apple shipped were largely considered to be stable, so I don't fault them for shipping under the circumstances. I think @SelenIT's arguments are also important to consider. Nonetheless it would be good to collect some data. `:is()` as the opposite of `:not()` would be pretty nice to have, if it's possible to pull off--and it might be if the specificity of existing stylesheets’ `:matches()` arguments are shown to not matter in practice. @LeaVerou Thanks for maintaining the table. :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2143#issuecomment-361750056 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2018 22:04:39 UTC