- From: SelenIT via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:49:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Maybe it's worth considering `:as()` instead of `:is()`? Still only 2 letters, but it clearly doesn't pair with `:not()`. It implies that the selector is basically still the main selector (part before `:`), but in a special state or situation where it acts (also) _as_ another selector, where it "mimics" that other selector, where it _only plays its role_ — which quite intuitively describes what this selector does (at least, for me). And it doesn't seem to be the inverse of `:not()`, IMO. But since English is far from being my native language, I might be completely wrong here. -- GitHub Notification of comment by SelenIT Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2143#issuecomment-360545045 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2018 17:50:40 UTC