Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] some inconsistent concepts and descriptions

I'd have to rewrite `<relative-selector>`, too, to avoid an infinite loop there. ;) It would be 

<complex-selector> = <compound-selector> <relative-selector>*
<relative-selector> = [ <combinator>? <compound-selector> ]+

instead of

<complex-selector> = <compound-selector> [ <combinator>? <compound-selector> ]*
<relative-selector> = <combinator>? <complex-selector>

Upside is it's slightly simpler grammar, downside I guess is that <complex-selector> is a more fundamental concept in CSS. I don't have a strong opinion either way. @dbaron / @tabatkins ?

GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2018 21:11:32 UTC