I'd have to rewrite `<relative-selector>`, too, to avoid an infinite loop there. ;) It would be ``` <complex-selector> = <compound-selector> <relative-selector>* <relative-selector> = [ <combinator>? <compound-selector> ]+ ``` instead of ``` <complex-selector> = <compound-selector> [ <combinator>? <compound-selector> ]* <relative-selector> = <combinator>? <complex-selector> ``` Upside is it's slightly simpler grammar, downside I guess is that <complex-selector> is a more fundamental concept in CSS. I don't have a strong opinion either way. @dbaron / @tabatkins ? -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/386#issuecomment-355128300 using your GitHub accountReceived on Wednesday, 3 January 2018 21:11:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:22 UTC