W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > January 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] some inconsistent concepts and descriptions

From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 12:04:55 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-354649902-1514808293-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
OK, I've tightened up the grammar:

- Type selector is only allowed as the first part of a compound selector.
- Pseudo-elements can follow any simple selectors, but can only be followed by other pseudo-elements and pseudo-classes.
- Removed pseudo-elements from the `<simple-selector>` production, consistent with the definition of “simple selector”.

@wargrey , @SelenIT , @dbaron Would you mind reviewing and letting me know if things look good now, or if anything further needs adjustment?

GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/386#issuecomment-354649902 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 1 January 2018 12:04:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:22 UTC