Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing] Percentage sizing section is kind of vague

The Working Group just discussed `Percentage sizing section is kind of vague`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Percentage sizing section is kind of vague<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1132<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: There's...the last comment is a summary.<br>
&lt;astearns> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1132#issuecomment-363623845<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1132#issuecomment-363623845<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Proposed edits for the behavior is [reads] and seems to be interoperably impl.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: If you have a mix width of calc 20px+50% we consider it as [missed] and once containing block resolves we resolve the %s. THere's a WPT PR and we're asking for WG review<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Has anyone reviewed the test PR?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: There's no spec text. Somebody needs to look at tests and see if that's what people want to add to the spec. We need a review of the tests.<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: Proposal is matching the behavior of % widths?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: There may be cases I didn't test correctly.<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: I think it does. But I think if it doesn't it ought to match.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: dbaron could you review?<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: Probably but maybe next week.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Is that enough for now fantasai ?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: If anybody else wants to review I'd prefer they do it in paralel with dbaron. This is the last open issue as far as I'm aware at which point we'd like to repub and issue LC.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: It's been on the agenda for 2 weeks. If someone needs to review and they need time let's assign it to that person.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Any other engines have a volunteer? fremy can I ask you to look?<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: I guess yes. It may not happen this week, but in theory yes.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Other volunteers?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: You can just defer to dbaron . But if you want more time I need to know how much.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Since this is a WD we can publish what w have and leave this open.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Yes, but I'd like to get to a point where we can ask for final review. But I am happy to publish a WD.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Opinions on an interrum draft or wait for this to resolve?<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/interrum/interim/<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: It is a WD so fantasai I can leave it up to you. I'm happy to call for resolution at any point.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Now is fine. It's out of date.<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1132#issuecomment-367408102 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:39:51 UTC