Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain] Clarify style containment effect 1

The Working Group just discussed `[css-contain] Clarify style containment effect 1`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: have the break properties not effected by style containment`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: [css-contain] Clarify style containment effect 1<br>
&lt;dael> github:<br>
&lt;dael> florian: There's a thing called style containment with 2 groups of effect. #2 isn't under discussion, that's fine. What's under discussion is how style containment shouldshouldn't effect break-before and break-after.<br>
&lt;dael> florian: A number of people said effecting made no sence. TabAtkins wasn't sure. TabAtkins are you now sure?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I think we can remove it.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Proposal is to have the break properties not effected by style containment?<br>
&lt;dael> florian: Or drop the part that claims they are.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Obj?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: have the break properties not effected by style containment<br>
&lt;liam> regrets+ Liam<br>
&lt;dael> florian: Part 2 talks about flow-from and flow-into. I think that should be moved to regions spec given relative maturity.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: I think that's fine. Can you open an issue on regions to add that?<br>
&lt;dael> florian: I can open a PR that changes both specs?<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Even better.<br>

GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2018 17:41:25 UTC