Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms] Named rotation axis

> Though another option is for the 2-D version to be what you get if you omit the axis/vector, and the 3-D version to be what you get if you include it.

That's what happens today, so yeah.  I do generally like the omitted value to default to some *specific* value (not be a distinct behavior in its own right), but if we can't come up with a good answer for what to call it, I'm fine with just leaving it out for now. We can always add a keyword for it later.

(I agree that `2d` is the best value, and also that it's impossible to use due to parsing concerns. Clearly the right answer is to use `d2` ^_^)

GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2018 23:28:56 UTC