W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > February 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-3] Is the exclusion of calc() from @font-feature-values intentional?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 01:11:48 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-362125335-1517447507-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@csnardi @svgeesus More specifically, the old grammar approach that Fonts 3 referred to *simply doesn't exist anymore* - CSS is no longer parsed according to CSS 2.1 Appendix G, it's parsed according to the Syntax spec, and generally you can only interact with the results via a standard CSS value-definition grammar (that is, `<number>` or `<integer>` or the like).  `NUMBER` has no meaning at all now. ^_^

GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1127#issuecomment-362125335 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2018 01:11:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:24 UTC