- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 16:05:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The Working Group just discussed `Static position should use content-box, not padding-box`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: align grid layout static position as content box rather then padding.` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: Static position should use content-box, not padding-box<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3020<br> <dael> Rossen: TabAtkins and fantasai noticed this while reviewing Grid and they asked if we should s tick to this or align to everything else. Opinions?<br> <dael> Rossen: TabAtkins is calling in<br> <dael> fantasai: I imagine he'sin favor<br> <TabAtkins> ^_^<br> <dbaron> makes sense to me<br> <dael> Rossen: We can resolve to align grid layout static position as content box rather then padding. Objections?<br> <dael> RESOLVED: align grid layout static position as content box rather then padding.<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3020#issuecomment-415086888 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2018 16:05:45 UTC