Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] 'overflow' 2-value syntax is in wrong order

Also, I'm not sure about the shorthand-expands-to-different longhands thing @fantasai mentions. I think that's not a trivial change at all.

For example we need to define how the shorthand serialization argument works in that case. If I did:

```css
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: hidden;
overflow-block: visible;
overflow-inline: hidden;
```

 * What should `element.style.overflow` return? Empty string presumably?
 * What should `element.style.cssText` serialize to?

That all needs more thought... Not saying that it's impossible to spec or implement, but...

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by emilio
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2988#issuecomment-413251457 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2018 16:22:20 UTC