Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] 'overflow' 2-value syntax is in wrong order

Also, I'm not sure about the shorthand-expands-to-different longhands thing @fantasai mentions. I think that's not a trivial change at all.

For example we need to define how the shorthand serialization argument works in that case. If I did:

overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: hidden;
overflow-block: visible;
overflow-inline: hidden;

 * What should `` return? Empty string presumably?
 * What should `` serialize to?

That all needs more thought... Not saying that it's impossible to spec or implement, but...

GitHub Notification of comment by emilio
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2018 16:22:20 UTC