Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color] "transparent" keyword being a special color value, which resolves to rgba(0, 0, 0, 0) by default?

The Working Group just discussed `"transparent" keyword being a special color value, which resolves to rgba(0,0,0,0) by default?`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Crossfade blends images in premultiplied space`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: "transparent" keyword being a special color value, which resolves to rgba(0,0,0,0) by default?<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2722<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: dbaron thought their libraries did blending already. I checked, same is true for us.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-4/#cross-fade-painting<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Given that I edited spec ^<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Spec blending of crossfade is done premultiplied space so transparent parts of images work as expected<br>
&lt;smfr> seems fine<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Any further opinions let me know else this is what i'm going with.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: And I'm most of the way through crossfade edits from last F2F<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: smfr says seems fine. Other opinions?<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: TabAtkins want resolution? Or publish and get feedback?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Get resolution to end thread. Crossfade blends images in premultiplied space<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Objections?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Crossfade blends images in premultiplied space<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2722#issuecomment-413250297 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2018 16:18:21 UTC