- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:06:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
So @meyerweb's request is basically that `minmax(1fr, 300px)` should act similar to `1fr`, except with a check in the flexible-sizing step that freezes it at 300px (like how flexbox handles `max-width/height`). Wrinkle: does this have the implicit `auto` minimum that `fr` defaults? That is, `1fr` is normally equivalent to `minmax(auto, 1fr)`; you can opt into a zero min by explicitly saying `minmax(0, 1fr)`. There doesn't seem to be an expansion-point for that here? (And we can't use the `min()` or `max()` functions, because you'd have to group the `fr` with either the min or max length, which aren't compatible units.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2611#issuecomment-385554736 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 30 April 2018 23:06:30 UTC