- From: SelenIT via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:34:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I believe that @tabatkins's reasoning [in the related issue](2326#issuecomment-366337621) and the fact that Edge managed to implement `position:sticky` without necessarily making it stacking context are good argument _against_ making this change in the spec. The `position:fixed` special case was introduced rather ad hoc, mostly to match the already long existed implementation that was too hard to "fix", but I hope the `position:sticky` case is different and we can do better this time. @smfr, could you please clarify what is the most difficult problem of implementing `position:sticky` without making it stacking context for `z-index: auto`? -- GitHub Notification of comment by SelenIT Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1053#issuecomment-383497571 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 23 April 2018 08:34:48 UTC