- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:53:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The Working Group just discussed `Clarify style containment property scoping #2349`, and agreed to the following resolutions: * `RESOLVED: Add this clarification to the spec.` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: Clarify style containment property scoping #2349<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2349<br> <dael> florian: Remaining item is definition to scoping to a sub tree is confusing.<br> <dael> florian: [reads]<br> <dael> florian: The confusing part is when you're scoping to a sub tree the thing that would be the root is outside the sub tree you're consiering. If you have an element with 2 descendents does it mean 2 disconnected roots? I think yo mean the element is the root for the purposes of styling.<br> <dael> TabAtkins: That was my intention.<br> <dael> florian: I think we should resolve this is our intention and we should improve the wording.<br> <dael> florian: [reads proposed text from issue]<br> <dael> TabAtkins: Yep.<br> <dael> Rossen: Good TabAtkins ?<br> <dael> TabAtkins: Yes.<br> <dael> Rossen: Objections to adding this clarification to the spec?<br> <dael> RESOLVED: Add this clarification to the spec.<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2349#issuecomment-380361614 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2018 07:53:40 UTC