- From: Dirk Schulze via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:35:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@nikosandronikos @smfr @AmeliaBR I do see a conflict for the spec going forward here. SVG2 is likely not going to PR/REC before the reduced spec for CSS Transforms 1. Transforms on descendants of `<text>` are a planned feature for SVG2. However, I am not sure if there is anything on SVG 1.1 or SVG2 that would restrict CSS Transforms on specifying transforms for `<text>` descendants at a later point of time. The other way around I am not sure that SVG2 relies on `<text>` descendants to be transformable right away. There might be something on the WebIDL side but maybe you could clarify. IMO, if there is, this probably should be removed in favour of CSS Typed OM. Ditto for transforms on paint server elements. Given that this feature is not widely implemented, I would like to suggest deferring this issue to the next level of CSS Transforms. @nikosandronikos @smfr @AmeliaBR Would you object to not change CSS Transforms 1? -- GitHub Notification of comment by dirkschulze Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/358#issuecomment-380037321 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 09:36:04 UTC