- From: Simon Fraser via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:46:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I have some concerns about this "clear to ship" process. Clearing a feature for shipping doesn't seem to be based on any testing or implementation criteria, so anyone is free to push their pet feature as "clear to ship", bypassing the normal process which is based on spec status. I think we should only used the "clear to ship" exception in exceptional circumstances, and not for things like conic gradient or rotate/translate/scale. Those should be handled via spec acceleration or splitting. When we do use the exception process, there should be testing and implementation criteria. -- GitHub Notification of comment by smfr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2388#issuecomment-380023205 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 08:46:57 UTC