W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] Doubts regarding the overflow directions description

From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 02:41:34 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-330729117-1505875284-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The `sideways-lr` and `sideways-rl` are deferred to L4, not removed, and @anawhj is right that in `sideways-lr` the inline direction is bottom-to-top that the overflow direction is different.

Maybe we want to refer to [Abstract-to-Physical Mappings](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-4/#logical-to-physical) and use logical terms, such as "block-end" and "inline-end"?

GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1569#issuecomment-330729117 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2017 02:41:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:18 UTC