- From: Stephan Sokolow via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 18:14:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> This suggests that you think site authors are going to be the ones using this property. I don't see why they would, tho. Gifs are generally just fine to upload alongside any other images. Because I'm both someone with hypervigilance issues **and** a designer/developer with a strong desire to control when and where animated elements are allowed within the sites I produce. (If a muted `<video>` wouldn't be allowed, then I probably won't allow an animated `<img>` either.) Hence my comment about using image-processing libraries server-side. (To limit the risk, I've taken to using a simple a pre-check stage which detects APNG and animated GIFs using only very limited, defensively-coded inspection routines before I feed only the animated stuff to the full parser.) On my hobby sites, a lack of this has actually been one of the factors delaying a move away from full pre-moderation to a more wiki-like experience. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ssokolow Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1615#issuecomment-334955625 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 7 October 2017 18:14:23 UTC