W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox][css-grid] Intrinsic sizing with ∑flex < 1 is broken

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 23:14:47 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-334316053-1507158873-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The Working Group just discussed `Flex sum < 1`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: Revert the previous resolution regarding flex sum <1 (as has already been done) and solicit dholbert's review.`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;TabAtkins> Topic: Flex sum &lt; 1<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-332671797<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: My understanding was that we had a resolution, but we had to revert it because there was a discontinutiy.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: Yes, we need to be continuous for a given flex item going from 0=>1, *and* for the flex container when its children do the same.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: Previous resolution fixed the flex item, but it created a discontinuity for the flex container.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: So our proposal ends up giving non-linear behavior for flex items when the sum is &lt;1, but it's continuous.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: Has dholbert looked at the revert?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> TabAtkins: He hasn't commented yet, so if he's seen it he hasn't approved it.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: So should we wait until we get feedback?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> TabAtkins: I'd prefer to get someone invested to give positive feedback.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> rego: I think we should accept the proposal.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: Have you reviewed the reverted text.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> rego: No, haven't checked the new text specifically, but I want continuity.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: fantasai, what do you want to do?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: Resolve to revert to the previous text unless dholbert has opposite ideas.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: Any objections to reverting?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Revert the previous resolution regarding flex sum &lt;1 (as has already been done) and solicit dholbert's review.<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-334316053 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2017 23:14:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:19 UTC