- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 23:39:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Which one are you talking about: CSS2.1 + with all the work in progress errata, or the one with the limited subset or errata that are ready for REC republication? I think the later does not need a new name at all. It's just CSS2.1, and if you want to be very specific, you can still say CSS2.1, 07 June 2011 Recommendation, or CSS2.1 29 February 2019. For the former, it probably should have a name, but not a new version number, since it isn't meant to be a new document that ever gets published as a replacement for the 2.1 REC, just a staging area for changes. So I'd call it something along these lines: "CSS2.1, errata staging draft" -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2008#issuecomment-346906615 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 24 November 2017 23:39:36 UTC