Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors3] better terminology for ~ sibling combinator?

@bkardell The problem with plural is that it doesn't work when reading right-to-left, which is usually the natural way to read selectors. For example, `a ~ b > c` would be

> Select any `c` element
> that is a child of a `b` element
> that is a following sibling [can't use plural!] of an `a` element.

"Following" is confusing indeed. What about "posterior" or "subsequent"?

 - Next Sibling Combinator
 - Posterior Sibling Combinator

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1382#issuecomment-301748912 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2017 11:05:48 UTC