W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > March 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping-1] should shadow-piercing descendant combinator (>>>) still be in specification

From: Dylan Barrell via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:42:47 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-290824598-1490992966-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

@tabatkins so can I take that as a "this will never work in v0"?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dylanb
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/640#issuecomment-290824598 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 31 March 2017 20:42:53 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Computed value of a negative calc unit that doesn't allow negative lengths."
Previous message: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] About shadow-including descendants"
Maybe in reply to: Dylan Barrell via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping-1] should shadow-piercing descendant combinator (>>>) still be in specification"
Next in thread: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping-1] should shadow-piercing descendant combinator (>>>) still be in specification"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:10 UTC