W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > March 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts][css-text] Variation Selection of Colorful (Emoji) or Monochrome Glyphs

From: Myles C. Maxfield via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 02:07:10 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-284923814-1488938829-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
So, it seems that we've settled on:

- Not using `font-variant-*`
- Not using `text-transform-*`
- Not using `font-palette`

I propose a new property, which is allowed to affect font fallback (see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/854#issuecomment-270544072):
```
font-presentation-style: auto | text | emoji
initial value: auto
```

This property behaves as if the appropriate variation selector is specified on all the characters which accept them (as defined by Unicode), but only if the character doesn't already have a variation selector.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by litherum
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/352#issuecomment-284923814 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2017 02:07:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 19 October 2021 01:30:29 UTC