W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > March 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts][css-text] Variation Selection of Colorful (Emoji) or Monochrome Glyphs

From: Myles C. Maxfield via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 02:07:10 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-284923814-1488938829-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
So, it seems that we've settled on:

- Not using `font-variant-*`
- Not using `text-transform-*`
- Not using `font-palette`

I propose a new property, which is allowed to affect font fallback (see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/854#issuecomment-270544072):
font-presentation-style: auto | text | emoji
initial value: auto

This property behaves as if the appropriate variation selector is specified on all the characters which accept them (as defined by Unicode), but only if the character doesn't already have a variation selector.

GitHub Notification of comment by litherum
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/352#issuecomment-284923814 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2017 02:07:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:09 UTC