Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-timing] reconsider name of frames() timing function

I did try to re-use the spacing keywords from flexbox but it seemed like a few keywords would produce the same result given that the steps are of equal length and I couldn't decide which one to use. It also felt like while the keywords make sense when thinking about a graph, they were a little less intuitive in the context of imagining an animation moving (which is how we expect most people to be thinking). I agree though, if we can make them work, then that seems attractive.

Do fill-start and fill-end overlap with `animation-fill-mode`? If so I think that would be a layering violation (whether an animation applies before/after the animation interval should be independent of how it progresses within that interval).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by birtles
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301#issuecomment-311806635 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2017 22:09:51 UTC