Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-timing] reconsider name of frames() timing function from Rachel Nabors via GitHub on 2017-07-05 (public-css-archive@w3.org from July 2017)

From: Rachel Nabors via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 23:50:06 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-313257162-1499298604-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Option for *keeping `steps()`* while being more explicit about what is happening:

`steps( <integer>, [ trim-start | trim-end | trim-both | no-trim ]`

or

`steps( <integer>, [ drop-first | drop-last | drop-ends | drop-none ]`

Riffing on an earlier comment by Tab :)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rachelnabors
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301#issuecomment-313257162 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2017 23:50:12 UTC