- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:02:53 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
So the issue we're discussing is, for writing systems that have mixed scripts: * Logically speaking, using a dictionary that are mix of multiple scripts makes sense and people seem to be good with it. Whether it should be a such physical dictionary, or allow UA to synthesize such mixed dictionary looks controversial, but I think it's implementation details CSS doesn't care about. * When UA synthesizes such a mixed dictionary, @r12a pointed out that authors may want to specify the dictionary for Latin. This allows scripts such as CJK or Arabic to use English or French depends on the content. The fallback/synthesizing/specialized dictionaries shouldn't need CSS specs, UA can just do it. I18N WG might be able to provide good guidance in doing so though. To allow authors to specify the secondary/thirdly dictionaries per scripts, we'll need a property. This should go to L4. For `word-break:break-all-hyphenate`, I think we should just change the existing behavior because the other behavior has no good use cases, though I do not understand all what Florian wrote in #791 -- I need more time to understand. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/785#issuecomment-271633334 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2017 17:02:59 UTC