- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:43:43 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I don't have strong opinion one or another, but a few things we should consider when discussing: * As pointed out by webkit bug, we do rely on system in many places even when there's no logical connections. I don't have good explanation why hyphenation should belong to one way. * Document can define how to determine languages in other ways than the `lang` attribute, HTML defines [the language of a node](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/dom.html#language). I guess people are fine to include this? * From the HTML definition, "explicitly unknown" and "specified unsupported languages" are two different things we should classify differently. When specified but we don't have specified dictionary, I think we should allow to experiment how to fallback, such as [#785 Hyphenation usages in CJK](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/785), -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/869#issuecomment-271627800 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2017 16:43:50 UTC