- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 21:41:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Got a few feedback offline: * Prefer to have `yes` in L3. - `yes` should skip ink regardless of scripts (or underline offset if Arabic wants `auto` to decide skip/not to skip by the underline position.) - `yes` should _not_ skip ink for strikethrough. * Since strikethrough is not included, `text-underline-skip-ink` might be more appropriate property name? - It includes overline, but `text-underline-position` includes overline too, so we'e at least consistent. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/962#issuecomment-277093095 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2017 21:41:38 UTC