W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > December 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-2] Syntax of "rotate" judged unintuitive (and not interoperable anyway)

From: Eric Willigers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 04:34:45 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-351606374-1513226082-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> It seems Chrome doesn't support the syntax of rotate: 0 0 1 45deg

This was [fixed](https://codereview.chromium.org/2531753002).

Web platform tests show the currently [valid](https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/master/css/css-transforms/parsing/rotate-parsing-valid.html) and [invalid](https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/master/css/css-transforms/parsing/rotate-parsing-invalid.html) syntax.

I don't think having two properties and a shorthand is justified. Fremy's example could be achieved with
`Value: none | <angle> && [ axis(<number>{3}) ]?`



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by ewilligers
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1269#issuecomment-351606374 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2017 04:35:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:26:44 UTC