- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 00:50:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
fantasai has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-transitions-1] Inline short value type definitions into propdef == Except when they get long and unweildy, and therefore really require the indirection, propdefs are easier to read (and the indexes thus generated more useful) when the full syntax of a property is inlined. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transitions-1/#property-index `transition-property` could be successfully inlined, I think. Maybe also transition, although I'm less convinced of that one given we can't use the property-referencing formats like e.g. `<'transition-property'>` due to the the way things are listed. - `transition-property: none | <custom-ident>#` (all is now a shorthand value, so saying <custom-ident> represents a property name is sufficient). - `transition-delay: <time>#` - `transition-duration: <time>#` - `transition-timing-function: <timing function>#` - `transition: [ [ none | <custom-ident> ] || <time> || <single-timing-function> || <time> ]#` ? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2030 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 3 December 2017 00:50:36 UTC