- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 10:18:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
dbaron has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == More intuitive names for selector performance profiles == @Marat-Tanalin sent [an email to www-style](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0039.html) saying: <blockquote> It probably makes sense to change the existing names for the fast (JS, currently “static”) and slow (CSS, currently “dynamic”) selector profiles. For example, using the “dynamic” term for something CSS-related is confusing given that dynamics is usually related to JS, while “static” in webdev is usually about something where JS is not involved: e.g. “static page” as opposed to a page where JS is used to add some dynamics. So something like “One-shot” or “One-time” (for the JS-oriented profile) and “Iterative” or “Recursive” (for the CSS-oriented profile) would probably be more intuitive names for selector performance profiles. </blockquote> Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1694 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 4 August 2017 10:19:32 UTC