W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] [varfont] Variation fonts deserve their own @-rules

From: Behdad Esfahbod via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:02:31 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-250213122-1475078547-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

@jfkew and I had originally come up with @font-family as well, for 
similar reasons.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by behdad
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/522#issuecomment-250213122 
using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 16:02:49 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Lea Verou via GitHub: "[csswg-drafts] [css-values] String concatentation"
Previous message: Lea Verou via GitHub: "[csswg-drafts] [css-values] Add url() alias that does not accept unquoted URLs"
In reply to: litherum via GitHub: "[csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] [varfont] Variation fonts deserve their own @-rules"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:03 UTC