- From: Javier Fernandez Garcia-Boente via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 10:52:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
javifernandez has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-grid] Intrinsic size computation with orthogonal grid items. == Given the following example: ``` <div style="display: grid; grid: 50px / auto; width: min-content; font: 25px/1 Ahem; border: 5px solid;"> <div style="color: magenta; background: cyan; writing-mode: vertical-lr;">XX X</div> <div style="color: red; background: blue; grid-column: 2;">XX X</div> </div> ``` Loading this example in Chrome or Firefox we've got the following results: **Chrome** ![Current result in Chrome](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2230241/18869876/9566e850-84ae-11e6-8e31-0b6555abf9f9.png) **Firefox** ![Current result in Firefox](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2230241/18870065/57baf6ee-84af-11e6-86c3-d75c6d2fc1cc.png) Current draft of Grid Layout specification states the following regarding grid container's intrinsic size computation: [5.2. Sizing Grid Container](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#intrinsic-sizes) > The min-content size of a grid container is the sum of the grid container’s track sizes (including gutters) in the appropriate axis, when the grid is sized under a min-content constraint. In the example defined above, we need to use grid's container intrinsic size as the available space for steps 1 and 2 of the [Grid Sizing Algorithm](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#algo-overview). After executing them, the orthogonal item has changed its min-content contribution, so as it' state in the specs we need to repeat steps 1 and 2 with such new min-content contribution. Since we are in the middle of a layout, we shouldn't compute again grid's container size, so even though column tracks's size have changed after running step 3, they is not reflected in the grid's intrinsic size. > 3- Then, if the min-content contribution of any grid items have changed based on the row sizes calculated in step 2, steps 1 and 2 are repeated with the new min-content contribution and max-content contribution (once only). Hence, I think we have an issue on how grid's intrinsic size is defined when there are orthogonal grid items; at least, if we really want to apply step 3 of the tracks sizing algorithm. I assume it's clear that we shouldn't make intrinsic size computation to depend on layout. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/537 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 10:52:43 UTC