- From: Eric A. Meyer via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:43:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Of Manuel’s three options, I have a slight preference for A. This might be due to my having gotten very used to the idea that tracks can spill out of grid containers. Maybe a little _too_ used to the idea, honestly. But it’s straightforward to explain and understand, and fits with what authors generally expect from regular blocks. I greatly dislike B—assuming any percentage to be zero will lead to deeply unintuitive results, effectively indistinguishable from bugs to the average author. I kind of like C, given that it taps into long-extant behavior. There are already descriptions of how to resolve similar situations in the table-layout module of CSS, and they could be leveraged. I’m just not sure they’re the best behavior for grids, so I lean away from C a bit. But I think Jen’s onto something with treating these situations as if they were a species of `minmax()` values. The trick is picking the right minimum and maximum values. Jen’s values might be right, or there might be better; I don’t know. -- GitHub Notification of comment by meyerweb Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/509#issuecomment-248652916 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2016 15:43:45 UTC