W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] span=1 and span>1 use different size contribution to 'auto' min-sizing

From: Mats Palmgren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:22:30 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-248422374-1474402949-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
After thinking some more about the 'auto' case, I suspect that 
both its min-sizing (2.1) and min/max-content (2.2/2.3) contributions
is probably correct for the span>1 case.  We apply both contributions
for 'min-content' and 'max-content' too in the span>1 case, but not
in the span=1 case.  So if the goal of these changes were "make 'auto'
min track sizes behave as 'min(max)-content' when sizing under
a min(max)-content constraint" then the current text looks correct.

If so, I think it would be equivalent to stating upfront that "if 
sizing under
a min(max)-content constraint then treat an 'auto' min track sizing
as a 'min(max)-content' track min sizing in the following rules"
(for any span).

GitHub Notification of comment by MatsPalmgren
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2016 20:22:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:03 UTC