- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:27:05 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It looks like a good proposal, thank you about that. Although I still prefer to make each step as small as possible and enhance incrementally with the real feedback, I'm fine to brainstorm and add them to the spec to show the direction we're moving forward to. I actually have less confidence on width-stepping part of the current spec, so I'm wondering we add block-height with at-risk, and defer width-stepping. Does this look reasonable? > in many cases baseline alignment within a differently-sized typeset block is not what is important True for blocks with smaller font size such as quotes, but occasionally when the block uses larger font size, such as headings, baseline is still important. Samples @astearns created use the last baseline of headings to snap to the baseline of the body text, and I saw other samples do it too. Also, the current workaround (to use inline-block) supports this scenario, as you can play with [the sample](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-step-sizing/examples/snap-height.html). So within the all possible combinations, I think: * Rounding up the box height * Align center or the last baseline have priority over other combinations. Thoughts? @fantasai @astearns -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/490#issuecomment-247769544 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 17 September 2016 13:27:23 UTC